<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Up City Articles &#187; flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.up-city.com/tag/flight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.up-city.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence Official: Info From State Department on Abdulmutallab Was ‘Very Thin’</title>
		<link>http://www.up-city.com/lionheart-group/intelligence-official-info-from-state-department-on-abdulmutallab-was-%e2%80%98very-thin%e2%80%99</link>
		<comments>http://www.up-city.com/lionheart-group/intelligence-official-info-from-state-department-on-abdulmutallab-was-%e2%80%98very-thin%e2%80%99#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lionheart Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issued-the-visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.up-city.com/uncategorized/intelligence-official-info-from-state-department-on-abdulmutallab-was-%e2%80%98very-thin%e2%80%99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ After State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly told reporters yesterday that an interagency process led by the National Counterterrorism Center was responsible for revoking Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab&#8217;s visa into the U.S. &#8212; and not the State Department, which issued the visa &#8212; perhaps some pushback was inevitable. Indeed, a U.S. intelligence official who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing case said that the State Department provided that process with &#8220;very thin information&#8221; and &#8220;definitely not enough&#8221; to yank Abdulmutallab&#8217;s visa and put him on the no-fly list. Recall that in November, Abdulmutallab&#8217;s father told officials at the U.S. embassy in Abuja, Nigeria that Abdulmutallab might pose a threat. Embassy officials put Abdulmutallab on a master database of non-specific threat information called TIDE , run by the National Counterterrorist Center. And that&#8217;s where the first bureaucratic chokepoint in Abdulmutallab&#8217;s saga is found.  The NCTC uses a set of criteria agreed upon by the State Department, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the intelligence community to determine who goes to a different list, known as the Terrorist Screening Database, run by the FBI. And if someone is on that database, that would prompt visa revocation and placement on the no-fly list. So what&#8217;s the standard for moving from TIDE to the Terrorist Screening Database? &#8220;Specific derogatory information leading to reasonable suspicion&#8221; that someone poses a terrorist threat. And what State got from Abdulmutallab&#8217;s father &#8212; and disseminated through the TIDE process &#8212; didn&#8217;t fit the bill, the U.S. intelligence official said. &#8220;Realistically, a lot of guys call every day and say their relative or former friend is dangerous,&#8221; the official explained. To use that level of information to revoke someone&#8217;s visa or stop someone from flying would be &#8220;unmanageable. We&#8217;d probably shut down air traffic.&#8221; It remains to be seen if that&#8217;s going to be a compelling explanation to lawmakers furious that Abdulmutallab got on Northwest Airlines Flight 253. But unless Congress weakens the standards for moving from TIDE to the Terrorist Screening Database, that&#8217;s the way it is. &#8220;If Congress wants us to change the criteria,&#8221; the official said, &#8220;we will move from there.&#8221; But buyer beware. See original here: Intelligence Official: Info From State Department on Abdulmutallab Was ‘Very Thin’ ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> After State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly told reporters yesterday that an interagency process led by the National Counterterrorism Center was responsible for revoking Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab&#8217;s visa into the U.S. &#8212; and not the State Department, which issued the visa &#8212; perhaps some pushback was inevitable. Indeed, a U.S. intelligence official who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing case said that the State Department provided that process with &#8220;very thin information&#8221; and &#8220;definitely not enough&#8221; to yank Abdulmutallab&#8217;s visa and put him on the no-fly list. Recall that in November, Abdulmutallab&#8217;s father told officials at the U.S. embassy in Abuja, Nigeria that Abdulmutallab might pose a threat. Embassy officials put Abdulmutallab on a master database of non-specific threat information called TIDE , run by the National Counterterrorist Center. And that&#8217;s where the first bureaucratic chokepoint in Abdulmutallab&#8217;s saga is found.  The NCTC uses a set of criteria agreed upon by the State Department, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the intelligence community to determine who goes to a different list, known as the Terrorist Screening Database, run by the FBI. And if someone is on that database, that would prompt visa revocation and placement on the no-fly list. So what&#8217;s the standard for moving from TIDE to the Terrorist Screening Database? &#8220;Specific derogatory information leading to reasonable suspicion&#8221; that someone poses a terrorist threat. And what State got from Abdulmutallab&#8217;s father &#8212; and disseminated through the TIDE process &#8212; didn&#8217;t fit the bill, the U.S. intelligence official said. &#8220;Realistically, a lot of guys call every day and say their relative or former friend is dangerous,&#8221; the official explained. To use that level of information to revoke someone&#8217;s visa or stop someone from flying would be &#8220;unmanageable. We&#8217;d probably shut down air traffic.&#8221; It remains to be seen if that&#8217;s going to be a compelling explanation to lawmakers furious that Abdulmutallab got on Northwest Airlines Flight 253. But unless Congress weakens the standards for moving from TIDE to the Terrorist Screening Database, that&#8217;s the way it is. &#8220;If Congress wants us to change the criteria,&#8221; the official said, &#8220;we will move from there.&#8221; But buyer beware. See original here: Intelligence Official: Info From State Department on Abdulmutallab Was ‘Very Thin’ </p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://lionheartgroupscampreventiontips.com/unemployment-news/intelligence-official-info-from-state-department-on-abdulmutallab-was-‘very-thin’/" title="Intelligence Official: Info From State Department on Abdulmutallab Was ‘Very Thin’">Intelligence Official: Info From State Department on Abdulmutallab Was ‘Very Thin’</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.up-city.com/lionheart-group/intelligence-official-info-from-state-department-on-abdulmutallab-was-%e2%80%98very-thin%e2%80%99/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

